Category Archives: Nadyne

experiences at the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing

This year, I got to attend the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing for the first time.  I was excited at finally being able to go: I’d been aware of it for awhile, but it kept on conflicting with other things.  Besides being able to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the Systers mailing list, I was part of a panel presentation about influencing without authority.

I got my first undergrad, in CS, in 1998.  There weren’t a lot of other women in my program.  I have a second undergrad in math, and a MS in technical communication — which, as a program, had more women, but I was in the human-computer interaction track, which had fewer women.  I also used to be an Emergency Medical Technician.  All of this is to say that I’m used to being the only woman, or maybe one of two or three women, in the room.  I’m used to having to hold my own with a bunch of guys, and I’ve long since come to terms with that.

Being at Grace Hopper was weird for me.  It sold out this year, so there were ~3600 other technical women there.  I’ve never been in a room with that many technical women before.  In one meeting with my previous employer, I actually had a meeting where it was all technical woman, and we took a picture to commemorate it because none of us had had such a thing naturally happen  before.  Being surrounded by so many technical women was just fantastic, even if it did feel very odd to me at first.

Grace Hopper also skewed pretty young.  Of those 3600 attendees, ~1500 were students.  The content of the conference reflects this: there were plenty of sessions aimed at students (both graduate and undergraduate), as well as sessions for people who were just starting out in their career.  I wish that I had known about this when I was an undergrad, because I would have loved to have had access to resources like this instead of looking around the handful (or less) of other women in my CS and math courses and wondering where the rest of the women were.  There was also some great material for people who were senior leaders, which I appreciated because I’d very much like to be in a position to take advantage of that material someday.  I kind of felt like I fell into a donut hole: there were a lot of women who were 25 or younger, and there were a good number of women 45 or older, but I didn’t feel like there were a lot of women in my particular tribe there: mid-career professionals who were looking to figure out how to continue growing their careers.  There was some material there.  Of the sessions that I felt were appropriate for me in my mid-career, my favorite session was “Women, Thought Leadership, Mentorship, and Sponsorship”.

One of the things about presenting at a conference, and also being there representing your company, you’re not really an attendee of the conference.  I mean, I got to go to sessions and all of that, but people were always coming up to me to introduce themselves either because they were interested in something about my company (say, the awesome swag that we included in the bag, or a job there) or because they were interested in or had a follow-up question about my session.

Another thing about being a presenter, especially when it’s your first time, is that you’re nervous before the session, so you don’t get to immerse yourself in the conference.  At least, I didn’t, maybe others are better able to do that.  And then there was the session itself.  My session was right after the keynote.  My fellow panelists and I arrived early, skipping the morning’s keynote so that we could chat and make sure that we were all prepared.  This meant that we didn’t know that the keynote ran over, so we went from an empty room with a handful of people there for our session at the time when we were supposed to start, and then suddenly the room was so full that our room monitor had to turn people away about 10 minutes after the start of the session.  We had a good discussion, not to mention some awesome questions (and I’ve got a bunch of blog posts to write as a result of those questions).

Overall, Grace Hopper was an awesome event, and I’m really glad that I attended.  I need to put some more thought into what I’m looking for as a mid-career technical woman, where to find it, and how I can help create that.

five awesome women in science and technology

In honor of Ada Lovelace Day, and inspired by a challenge to name five awesome women in science and technology in five different countries, I’ll give my answer.

  1. Margaret Livingstone, Harvard Medical School (US).  She gave the keynote talk at UIST 2012 (which I just attended, and it was awesome, and I need to write it up) about art and vision, and gave me quite a lot to think about in terms of how we process visual information.  She is in the process of expanding her book Vision and Art, to be republished next year.
  2. Ada Yonath, Weizmann Institute of Science (Israel).  She won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 2009 for her work about ribosomes.  (The previous female Nobel laureate in chemistry was 1964, so she ended quite the dry spell.)
  3. Cheryl Praeger, University of Western Australia.  She’s done some amazing work on group theory and algorithm complexity.
  4. Tebello Nyokong, Rhodes University (South Africa).  She is the first woman from South Africa to have won the L’Oréal-UNESCO award for women in science, for her work on cancer treatments.
  5. Sophia Drossopoulou, Imperial College London (UK).  She might just be my favorite woman doing work in programming languages.
I’m overdue for a write-up of my experience at the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing, too.  For now, suffice it to say that it was a freakin’ awesome experience to be in a room with 3600 other technical women, and I nearly fell out of my chair when my panel session about influencing without authority filled the room and had to turn people away.  

a-conferencing we will go – Grace Hopper and UIST

I got lucky, and get to attend back-to-back conferences this year.  I’m pretty excited about both.

The first is the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing, which I just heard has sold out.  3600 of my fellow women in technology will be there.  I’ll be speaking on a panel about how to influence without authority.  I’ll also be working in the VMware booth for recruitment purposes, so if you’re interested in jobs at VMware, come by our booth and I’ll be happy to tell you more about what it’s like to work here.

Then I leave Baltimore and head to Cambridge for UIST 2012.  I’ve been wanting to go for years and years, but it always either conflicted with or was too close to OOPSLA for me to be able to attend.  So I’m totally geeked to be able to attend this year.  I’m just attending UIST, which is a nice change.

If you’re going to be at either of those, feel free to ping me via twitter so that we can meet up for coffee or cocktails.

storage admins needed for usability study

My team is conducting a usability study, and we’re in need of virtual storage admins to take part in it.  We expect it to take no more than 90 minutes of your time, and we will provide compensation for your time.  If you’re local to Palo Alto, we invite you to come to our Palo Alto campus for the session; otherwise the session can also be conducted remotely through WebEx. We plan to run the sessions from September 27th until October 5th.

If you’re interested, please fill out this very short survey to tell us a bit about yourself and your virtual environment.

women connecting women at VMware

This summer, VMware piloted a mentoring program for our female interns: each of our incoming women were offered the opportunity to be paired with a senior woman at the company.

I had my own (female) intern reporting to me, doing awesome research over the course of the 12-week internship.  I also participated in this program, and mentored a design intern.  For me as a mentor, it was a great way to get to meet with someone who I wouldn’t’ve gotten to spend a lot of time with otherwise, and hear about what life is like for woman who is currently working on her CS undergraduate degree.

Over the course of the 12 weeks, we talked about a lot of things, including (but definitely not limited to:

  • what it’s like to do user experience at VMware
  • her work with the women in CS program at her university
  • the different career paths available, and how career paths often take unexpected and awesome twists and turns
  • what it’s like to juggle two professional careers, and the tradeoffs that you have to make along the way
  • opportunities to help out other women understand the value of a CS degree

… and so much more.  I’ve only barely scratched the surface.

It was a really good experience for me.  Answering questions makes you think about things, and hearing the perspective of someone who is new to the field is always a good reminder about what we can do to help new people get established.

The best part about this is, I get to see both of these interns again soon.  They’re both going to be attending the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing conference this year.  I’ll be part of one of the panel sessions, how to influence without authority and why it is important.  I just noticed that Nikki, my research intern, was featured in the GHC news, writing about her first Grace Hopper Celebration (and wearing a VMware t-shirt, too!).  It’s my first GHC, so I’m excited to be able to participate too.

VMworld! next week!

Next week is VMworld, and I’ll be there.  Want to meet up?  Ping me (honestly, reaching me via twitter is probably going to be best, since my mail is going to get pretty backed up next week) and we’ll meet up for coffee or cocktails.

on watching user studies

This week, I’m conducting some user research.  Just after I had wrapped up a session with one of the participants in this research, I saw a tweet:

Have you ever wondered what it feels to be an engineer watching research studies on your product? http://i.imgur.com/1Hheq.gif  via @iamnirav

Have you ever wondered what it feels to be an engineer watching research studies on your product?

virtual infrastructure architects and senior admins needed for user research

I’m conducting some user research in the coming months, and I need virtual infrastructure architects and senior admins to participate in it.  At a high level, I’m looking for virtual infrastructure architects and senior admins who do tasks such as manage and monitor virtual infrastructure, plan capacity, create VMs, migrate VMs, or deal with virtual infrastructure help tickets.  If you’re local to Palo Alto, then you can come to my usability lab and participate in person; if you’re outside of Palo Alto (including outside of the US), then we’ll conduct the studies remotely via WebEx.

This user research is a little different than usual: I’m going to be doing a lot of research on a related group of topics in the coming months, and so I’m putting together a small pool of people who will participate in multiple studies over that amount of time.  Every 6-8 weeks, I’ll run another usability study, and I’ll pull from this small pool of participants for it.  You don’t need to participate in each study, but you do need to commit to participating in at least one study.  The first study begins on Monday, August 13.  You will be compensated for participating in each study, and your level of compensation grows with each study you participate in.

If you’re interested in participating, then fill out this survey to tell me a bit more about what you do and what your virtual environment looks like.  And if you’ve got any questions, feel free to ping me.